Newswire

The Life Matters Media Newswire aims to serve as a comprehensive portal of all news related to end of life decision making and care. We aggregate stories from other media outlets in one place- here, where you can access them easily. We also strive to produce original content covering stories we feel are receiving scant attention.


American Medical Association Opposes “Death With Dignity,” Despite Calls For Legalization

Despite calls for legalization from a growing number of proponents and others who came to support physician-assisted suicide in the wake of the high-profile death of Brittany Maynard, the American Medical Association remains firmly opposed to such policy.

Maynard, 29, moved to Oregon to take advantage of the state’s physician-assisted suicide law and ingested a lethal dose of doctor-prescribed barbiturates in November. She had been diagnosed with an aggressive brain tumor in January. Oregon is one of five U.S. states where physician-assisted suicide is legal; legislatures in Washington, Vermont, Montana and New Mexico have also passed measures to enact what supporters call “Death with Dignity” legislation.

The Chicago-based AMA is the nation’s largest organization of physicians and represents nearly 200,000 doctors, medical students and residents. Its policy remains unmoved amid a national debate regarding the risks and benefits of physician-assisted suicide.

B

Brittany Maynard’s decision made headlines across the globe

“It is understandable, though tragic, that some patients in extreme duress – such as those suffering from a terminal, painful, debilitating illness – may come to decide that death is preferable to life,” according to an AMA statement sent to Life Matters Media. “However, allowing physicians to participate in assisted suicide would cause more harm than good. Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.”

Advocates say that physician-assisted suicide is compatible with modern medical ethics and should be more accessible. Peg Sandeen, executive director of the Death with Dignity National Center in Oregon, told LMM that the attention focused on Maynard’s decision reflects increasing support among Americans for “Death with Dignity” laws.

“I am saddened by the tragedy of this young woman’s death, but I am thankful the state of Oregon offered her options at the end of her life,” she said. “When you have a compelling story, when you show a young family with a member dying, suddenly an issue that has broad support becomes something that everyone is engaged in.”

According to a 2013 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, Washington physicians are becoming more comfortable with the state’s law.

“Our ‘Death with Dignity’ program has been well accepted by patients, families, and staff. We attribute this to the professionalism of our advocates, the great care taken by our prescribing and consulting clinicians when interacting with patients and families, the low profile of the ‘Death with Dignity’ program overall, and the willingness of the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance leadership to allow considerable debate before the program was developed,” researchers led by Dr. Elizabeth Loggers write. “A few clinicians who were initially strongly opposed to the ‘Death with Dignity’ program subsequently expressed their willingness to participate as consulting or prescribing clinicians, which further supports acceptance of the program.”

The AMA recommends hospice care for those seriously ill and nearing the end of life – care designed to comfort, not cure or hasten death – and multidisciplinary interventions such as pastoral support and family counseling. “Patients near the end of life must continue to receive emotional support, comfort care, adequate pain control, respect for patient autonomy, and good communication,” the statement read.

Dr. Daniel Sulmasy, associate director of the University of Chicago’s MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, echoed the AMA’s concerns during a recent Intelligence Squared debate in New York that was broadcast nationally on public radio.

“We strongly support the right of patients to refuse treatments and believe physicians have a duty to treat pain and other symptoms even to the point of hastening death,” Sulmasy said. “But empowering physicians to assist patients with suicide is quite another matter. Striking at the heart not just of medical ethics, but of ethics itself, because the very idea of interpersonal ethics depends upon our mutual recognition of each other’s equal independent worth, the value that we have simply because we are fellow human beings.”

Written by . No comments. Posted in Politics and Law, Society and Culture. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .

Islam And Medicine: Differing Views On Brain Death

Dr. Aasim Padela

Dr. Aasim Padela

Muslim physicians, bioethicists and faith leaders must convene and debate brain death to better understand its significance and offer guidance to patients and families facing the end of life, said Dr. Aasim Padela, an emergency physician and director of the University of Chicago’s Initiative on Islam and Medicine. Padela addressed differing Islamic beliefs regarding brain death at the Dorothy J. MacLean Fellows Conference for Clinical Medical Ethics.

Padela began by explaining how Islamic bioethics concepts are shaped from a multitude of sources, including divine ascription to what is considered “good” and “evil,” textual revelation from the Qur’an, revelation from the Sunnah– the Prophet Muhammad’s statements, actions and tacit approvals– and Islamic moral theology, Usal al-fiqh.

In the Islamic tradition, a dead body should be treated with dignity and care. “Breaking bones of the dead is akin to breaking bones of the living,” Padela said. “Body is more than an empty shell and is the bearer of rights and respect.”

Because brain death is not total brain failure, beliefs about its significance vary amongst Muslim physicians and ethicists– a brain dead patient’s pituitary gland or hypothalamus may continue to function. The debate about brain death emerged about 25 years ago, when advances in medical technologies allowed physicians to artificially prolong life longer than ever before.

According to a national survey of 250 American Muslim physicians conducted by Padela, 54 percent did not consider brain death to be “true death.” Seventy percent said they are psychologically troubled by withdrawing life support from brain dead patients.

However, many respondents seldom discussed or shared their beliefs with other Muslim medical professionals. Fifty-five percent of participants said they never or rarely read Islamic bioethics books. Nearly 80 percent said they never or rarely look to Islamic medical, or fiqh, academy verdicts.

The Islamic Fiqh Academy has ruled brain death as a form of legal death if all vital functions of the brain cease irreversibly, and the brain has started to degenerate. Some proponents argue brain death is “death” because it indicates the departure of the soul, and it is the soul that animates the body.

Others believe brain death is not “death” because the brain is “not tied to the soul” or “privileged over any other organ.”

“Some juridical councils such as the Organization of Islamic Conferences’ Islamic Fiqh Academy (OIC-IFA) equate brain death with cardiopulmonary death, while others such as the Islamic Organization of Medical Sciences (IOMS) analogize brain death to an intermediate state between life and death. Still, other councils have repudiated the notion entirely,” Padela wrote in a 2013 study exploring end of life beliefs amongst Muslims. “For those searching for ‘Islamically-sanctioned’ responses that can inform their practice, both the OIC-IFA and IOMS verdicts have palpable gaps in their assessments and remain clinically ambiguous.”

Padela called for renewed interdisciplinary discourse exploring Islamic beliefs about whole-brain and brain-stem death, cardiopulmonary, or traditional, death and the clinical responsibilities of physicians caring for Muslim patients.

Written by . No comments. Posted in Society and Culture. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

Intelligence Squared Debate: Legalize Assisted Suicide?

Intelligence Squared Debate

Intelligence Squared Debate

Two weeks after the physician-assisted suicide of 29-year-old Brittany Maynard, an Intelligence Squared debate in New York explored whether the policy is compatible with the doctor’s healing role. The argument opposing physician-assisted suicide laws was judged the winning one by an audience gathered at the Kaufman Music Center Thursday night.

Maynard moved to Oregon to take advantage of the state’s “Death with Dignity” law before cancer caused her increased suffering. She was diagnosed with an aggressive glioblastoma in January; Maynard and her husband, Dan Diaz, left their home in California because that state does not allow physicians to prescribe barbiturates for terminally ill adults wishing to end their lives.

Physician-assisted suicide is legal in four other U.S. states: Washington, Vermont, Montana and New Mexico. Roughly 750 people in Oregon have used the law since it was enacted in 1997 to obtain and consume the lethal drugs.

Arguing for legalization were philosopher Peter Singer, a Princeton University professor of bioethics, and Andrew Solomon, an award-winning writer and Columbia University professor of clinical psychology.

Those opposing physician-assisted suicide were Baroness Ilora Finlay, a palliative care physician and president of the British Medical Association, and Dr. Daniel Sulmasy, the associate director of the University of Chicago’s MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics.

Solomon supported physician-assisted suicide that was both regulated and easily accessible for the dying.

“Aiding dying needs to be tightly regulated, as any life or death matter does, from driving to surgery,” he said. “But while no one should be pressed into assisted dying, no one should be categorically denied that right. It’s about dignity.”

The wish to end life may be a rational decision for some seriously ill adults, Solomon argued, because it ends mental and physical deterioration. It also allows the opportunity to find “great meaning” in final moments, he said.

“From a non-theological point of view, it can be argued that the meaning people attach to that stage of life is an artifact of the human imagination,” Solomon added. “It’s not about suicide. Suicide responds to personal disintegration while this precludes it.”

Solomon argued that comfort care, such as palliative medicine or hospice, does not negate the need for “Death with Dignity” laws.

“It’s nothing short of medical arrogance to say that palliative care and hospice can adequately deal with the end of every life,” he said. “Hospice, in fact, can impose an authoritarian, hard, paternalistic view that the hospice way of dying is the only way.”

In response, Sulmasy said he strives to help the seriously ill die with dignity. However, he does not “want to help you or your daughter or your uncle commit suicide.” He called physician-assisted suicide “bad medicine and bad policy.”

“We strongly support the right of patients to refuse treatments and believe physicians have a duty to treat pain and other symptoms even to the point of hastening death,” Sulmasy said. “But empowering physicians to assist patients with suicide is quite another matter. Striking at the heart not just of medical ethics, but of ethics itself, because the very idea of interpersonal ethics depends upon our mutual recognition of each other’s equal independent worth, the value that we have simply because we are fellow human beings.”

Sulmasy said the terminally ill must be reminded of their intrinsic dignity at a time of fierce doubt, especially in a society that prioritizes independence, youth and beauty.

The opposition was determined the winner after 22 percent of participating audience members said physician-assisted suicide should not be legalized, up from only 10 percent at the start of the debate. Sixty-seven percent of respondents at the end supported legalization, up only 2 percent.

“Don’t vote for this dangerous, dangerous law that actually deprives people of the possibility of having their dignity and having doctors who have to work to improve their quality of life,” Finlay said in closing remarks. “This law allows them to throw the towel in.”

Intelligence Squared U.S. is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization founded in 2006 that aims to provide constructive public discourse and reasoned analysis. 

Written by . 1 Comment. Posted in Life Choices, Society and Culture. Tagged with , , , , , , , , .

Chicago End-Of-Life Care Coalition Hosts Fall Benefit

Nearly 100 medical professionals, storytellers and patient advocates attended the Chicago End-of-Life Care Coalition’s annual fall benefit, an effort that raised funds supporting the organization’s educational programming throughout the Chicago area. The event, “An Afternoon of Stories,” was presented with Stories on Stage, one of the city’s only live, dramatic short story reading series.

One-by-one, performers shared emotional, often comical, stories about death and dying as guests sipped craft beers at Revolution Brewing in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood.

Dr. Charles Rhee, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago’s Center for Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, said he appreciated the nonprofit organization’s commitment to educating the public about the importance of end of life conversations and advance care planning.

“It’s amazing to see such a gathering of people united for such a cause, and the performances really highlighting the joys and terrors of the end of life,” he said. “I think end of life discussions are taboo in America because of our health care system. We talk so much about cures and extending life as long as possible, and we forget about death. The most natural things in the world are birth and death.”

Rhee said his favorite story of the night was “Lilacs” performed by Brendan Kelly, partly because of its focus on HIV/AIDS and its “dark and powerful” tone. The script sampled fiction from acclaimed author and activist Dr. Abraham Verghese.

Brendan Kelly performing "Lilacs"

Brendan Kelly performing “Lilacs”

Rachael Telleen, project director for POLST Illinois, said she was encouraged by the diversity of the attendees.

“Seeing people of different ages, seeing people with an interest in end of life, having so many supporters is fabulous,” she said. “I hope the CECC helps the POLST form become more common and accepted, especially as people keep aging.”

POLST is more detailed than conventional living wills or advance directives- these medical orders extend patients the freedom to indicate preferences regarding resuscitation, intubation, intravenous antibiotics and feeding tubes, among other things. POLST is an updated version of Illinois Department of Health Uniform DNR Advance Directive and is intended only for the terminally ill.

The evening was sponsored by several end of life care organizations, including Midwest CareCenter, Rainbow Hospice and Journeycare.

“I love the fact that people are willing to come and hear stories about death and dying,” said Ronette McCarthy, legal counsel for Elements, the cremation company and a member of the CECC’s board of directors. “I look at the CECC as one of the only collaborative end of life groups in the Chicago area. It consists of physicians, attorneys, chaplains, doctors and social workers.”

Life Matters Media founders Dr. Mary F. Mulcahy and Randi Belisomo are members of the CECC.

Written by . No comments. Posted in Society and Culture. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

The Death Of Brittany Maynard Sparks Debate On “Death With Dignity”

Brittany Maynard and her husband

Brittany Maynard and her husband, Dan Diaz. Courtesy Compassion & Choices on YouTube.

The young woman who moved to Oregon to take advantage of the state’s controversial physician-assisted suicide law ingested a lethal dose of doctor-prescribed barbiturates Sunday, sparking national debate on so-called “death with dignity” legislation.

Brittany Maynard, 29, was diagnosed with an aggressive glioblastoma brain tumor in January and was later given six months to live. Maynard and her husband, Dan Diaz, moved from California because that state does not allow terminally ill adults to end their lives with doctor-prescribed drugs.

“She died as she intended– peacefully in her bedroom, in the arms of her loved ones,” Sean Crowley, a spokesman for advocacy group Compassion & Choices, told The Associated Press. Maynard suffered increasingly frequent and longer seizures, severe head and neck pain, and other stroke-like symptoms, he said.

Working with Compassion & Choices, Maynard used her story to raise awareness about physician-assisted suicide and inspire other terminally ill Americans to end their lives on such terms.

“I don’t wake up every day and look at it, I know it’s in a safe spot,” Maynard said in a Compassion & Choices-produced video about her life-ending drugs. That video has been viewed more than 10 million times on YouTube. “I will pass peacefully with some music I like in the background.”

Gwen Fitzgerald, director of communications with Compassion & Choices, told Life Matters Media she believes younger people can identify with Maynard and learn from her decision.

“The attention has been incredible, very heartwarming that people have listened to what she had to say. People are trying to have a more open mind about her decision,” Fitzgerald said. “We tend to think about people who are dying as older. Obviously, a 29-year-old is a bit more a-typical, thank goodness, but her message is resonating with a broad range of audiences.”

Physician-assisted suicide is legal in four other states: Washington, Vermont, Montana and New Mexico. More than 750 people in Oregon have used the law to die.

Brittany Maynard

Brittany Maynard. Courtesy Compassion & Choices on Youtube.

Both the Oregon Death with Dignity Act (1994) and the Washington statute (2008) set safeguards to protect patients against coercion from physicians or from family members. Each patient must be of sound mind when requesting the prescription and be informed of palliative and hospice care options. Two doctors must confirm a diagnosis of terminal illness with no more than six months of life-expectancy.

Maynard’s decision and influence upset some religious and disability rights groups.

“We are saddened by the fact that this young woman gave up hope, and now our concern is for other people with terminal illnesses who may contemplate following her example,” Janet Morana, executive director of Priests for Life, said in a statement to the AP. “Brittany’s death was not a victory for a political cause. It was a tragedy, hastened by despair and aided by the culture of death invading our country.”

Dr. Ira Byock, a palliative care physician, said he believed Maynard was being “exploited” by Compassion & Choices and that palliative medicine could have aided in alleviating her suffering.

“Compassion & Choices actually sold to the public the legalization of physician-assisted suicide because of unremitting pain. But we can control pain,” he said on PBS Newshour. “What’s happening now is that over 85 percent of people who use Oregon’s law and end their life do so because of existential or emotional suffering, feeling of being a burden to their families, feeling the loss of the ability to enjoy life, feeling the loss of meaning.”

Byock, author of  The Best Care Possible, said Maynard could have received “excellent whole person care and be assured of dying gently in her bed surrounded by her family.” Palliative medicine is provided to the terminally and seriously ill to help treat symptoms and side-effects of disease. The goal of palliative care is not cure.

But Craig Klugman, chair of DePaul University’s Department of Health Sciences and a bioethicist, told LMM many terminally ill patients wish to have control over their final days and die only when they feel ready.

“As the Oregon experience has shown, for many patients, assisted suicide is about having a feeling of control– since a large percent of individuals who receive a prescription for their death do not take it,” he said. “The decision is a very personal one that needs to take into account not just the patient but also their family. That this was, controversially, the right decision for Mrs. Maynard does not mean it is the right decision for anyone else.”

Klugman said the assumption of many medical professionals that palliative care and other comfort treatments negate the need for “death with dignity” laws is based in belief that suicide is immoral.

“Sudden, unplanned suicide by healthy people is tragic and leaves survivors with questions and often guilt that they could have or should have done more. But that is not the case here,” he added. “For Mrs. Maynard, even though palliative care could help with her acute symptoms, it could not assist with her existential ones— watching her lose control over her body and mind, the loss of what she felt was her dignity as others had to take on more and more of her daily activities of living, and living with the knowledge that for her, this diminishment was not a life she wanted to experience.”

Peg Sandeen, executive director of the Death with Dignity National Center in Oregon, told LMM the national attention on Maynard’s decision reflects increasing support among Americans for “death with dignity” legislation.

“I am saddened by the tragedy of this young woman’s death, but I am thankful the state of Oregon offered her options at the end of her life,” she said. “When you talk to average Americans, between 60 to 70 percent of people say ‘yes,’ ‘death with dignity’ should be legal. When you have a compelling story, when you show a young family with a member dying, suddenly an issue that has broad support becomes something that everyone is engaged in.”

Written by . No comments. Posted in Life Choices, Politics and Law, Society and Culture. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

daniel-gaitanDaniel Gaitan

Daniel Gaitan serves as a content producer...More